ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2026
Retrospective Analysis of Vesicourethral-Anastomosis Stricture/Urethral Stricture After Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy With and Without Radiotherapy.
Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-assisted vesical neck h-shaped flap plasty for vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis: a case report.AME case reports · 2026Article
- Retrospective Analysis of Vesicourethral-Anastomosis Stricture/Urethral Stricture After Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy With and Without Radiotherapy.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveVesicourethral anastomotic stenosis and/or urethral stenosis (VUAS/US) is a complication of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of VUAS/US after RARP and to identify potential risk factors. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a retrospective assessment of clinical records of patients with RARP as primary prostate cancer treatment (January 2011-December 2018) and investigated associations between VUAS/US formation and radiotherapy, pT-stage, tumor margins, Gleason score, nerve-sparing, and postoperative duration of bladder catheterization. Statistical analysis was performed via uni- and multivariable cox regression; risk estimation was done with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: 809 patients were included in the study. Median clinical follow-up was 61.0 months (IQR 50.0-75.0) and 175 (22%) patients received radiotherapy. VUAS and US were recorded in 19 (2.3%) and 10 (1.2%) patients, respectively. Whereas in univariable analysis radiotherapy, pT-stage ≥ pT3a, higher Gleason score, positive tumor margins, nerve-sparing, and prolonged duration of bladder catheterization were significant risk factors, in a multivariable analysis only radiotherapy (p = 0.003) and prolonged duration of bladder catheterization (p = 0.0309) proved to be independently predictive. Estimated 5-year risk of VUAS/US formation was lower without than with radiotherapy (2.1% [95% CI: 0.9-3.3] vs. 7.3% [95% CI: 3.4-11]) and with normal compared to prolonged bladder catheterization (2.6% [95% CI: 1.4-3.8] vs. 9.9% [95% CI: 2.3-18]). Retrospectivity and the limited number of events were our major limitations. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Low incidence of VUAS/US in RARP. Patients undergoing radiotherapy or requiring prolonged catheterization should be explicitly informed about the risk of VUAS/US and about symptoms. Also, physicians must be aware.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.