ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026
Rice husk ash and nanomaterial-blended cement composites: a review.
Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Waste Material Utilization in Civil Engineering Applications: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions-A Scoping Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sustainable Silica Nanoparticles from Jasmine Rice Husk as Reinforcing Fillers for Natural Rubber Composites.ACS omega · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enhancing the sustainability and performance of cement composites is crucial to the protection of the environment and advancing building technology. Numerous studies have been carried out to evaluate binary and ternary mixes incorporating micro- and nanosized supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) to achieve these goals. Rice husk ash (RHA) stands out as an SCM due to its abundance as an agricultural residue having pozzolanic properties. However, the relatively low reactivity and the reduced workability due to the mesoporous structure hinder the adoption of RHA in cement composites. While nanomaterials offer the advantage of improved microstructure and higher reactivity, their high cost and demanding processing techniques limit their widespread adoption. Combined blends of nano- and micro-sized SCMs have shown promising results, as synergistic effects can mitigate their individual drawbacks, but the inter relationship is unclear. This paper reviews the existing studies on RHA and nanomaterial-blended cement composites to provide an understanding of their interactions. The available literature is categorized by the type of nanomaterial employed, and the mechanical, microstructural, and durability properties are summarized. The correlation between mechanical properties is derived, and summarized results are discussed to identify the underlying mechanism. Overall, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current knowledge on RHA-nanomaterial-blended cement composites. This summary will be beneficial in identifying research gaps and suggesting future directions for advancements in sustainable blended cement composites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.