ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Skeletodental and soft tissue changes following treatment with herbst and pendex appliances: a retrospective CBCT study.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo compare skeletodental and soft tissue changes in growing Class II patients treated with Herbst or Pendex appliances, followed by fixed edgewise appliances, using two-dimensional lateral cephalometric radiographs extracted from three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography scans. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty-six patients were examined: 23 treated with Herbst (12.07 ± 1.49 years, 12 males/11 females) and 23 with Pendex (11.76 ± 1.18 years, 10 males/13 females). CBCT-derived lateral cephalograms were analyzed at T1 (initial), T2 (6 months post-Herbst removal or immediately post-Pendex removal), and T3 (final records after edgewise fixed appliance removal). Cephalometric analysis assessed skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes. Repeated measures ANOVA analyzed within-group changes across the three time points, and t-tests were used to compare between-group differences at each time point and evaluate changes from T1 to T3.
resultsFrom T1 to T3, the Herbst group exhibited a significant decrease in the SNA angle, a non-significant increase in SNB, and significant increases in mandibular dimensions, including total length, body length, corpus length, and ramus height. In contrast, the Pendex group demonstrated stable SNA values, a significant increase in SNB, and mandibular dimensional changes comparable to those observed in the Herbst group. Vertically, both groups remained stable with no significant differences in skeletal vertical parameters. Overall, no significant between-group differences were observed in skeletal, dental, or soft tissue parameters between T1 and T3. CONCLUSION/CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We did not detect statistically significant differences in overall skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes between the two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.