Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41521315›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Dynamic thumb localization and its adaptation: quantification with a novel robotic task.

Luis Garcia-Fernandez, Andria J Farrens, Christopher A Johnson, Vicky Chan, Joel C Perry, Eric T Wolbrecht, David J Reinkensmeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luis Garcia-FernandezMechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA. garciaf7@uci.edu.
Andria J FarrensMechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.
Christopher A JohnsonMechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.
Vicky ChanMechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.
Joel C PerryMechanical Engineering Department, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 83844, USA.
Eric T WolbrechtMechanical Engineering Department, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 83844, USA.
David J ReinkensmeyerMechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.

Funding

EFFECTIVENESS OF ROBOT-ASSISTED HAND MOVEMENT TRAINING AFTER STROKER01HD062744 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI David Jay Reinkensmeyer · 2010 to 2026
$3.5M
ACL HHS 90REGE0010NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD062744NIH HHS R01HD062744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The thumb plays a crucial role in hand function, yet its proprioceptive abilities remain poorly understood. Here we quantified dynamic thumb localization ability, as well as how this ability adapts to a perturbation, in unimpaired participants. For this, we developed a novel task in which a robot moved the thumb in a circle and participants pressed a button when they felt their thumb aligning with a target point on a screen, receiving visual error feedback in the form of a ball jumping toward the target after they pushed the button. The task also incorporated a propriovisual rotational perturbation to elicit and measure adaptation. To characterize thumb localization ability, we varied thumb speed and rotation diameter, assessed the effect of the propriovisual rotational perturbation, and compared index finger performance. Following task familiarization, average thumb localization error was relatively consistent, with a constant error (CE) of - 5.9°, variable error (VE) of 25.2°, and absolute error (AE) of 29.2°. Errors did not change significantly with speed or circle diameter. Reversing thumb rotation temporarily increased error followed by rapid error adaptation across the next 20 trials, as would be expected if individuals adapted using a body-centered (movement-aligned) frame of reference rather than a world-centered spatial frame. Localization error was comparable for the thumb and the index finger error for the same task and was correlated with a different, robotic assessment of finger proprioception (ρ = 0.61, p = 0.001). These findings indicate that dynamic thumb localization is somewhat inaccurate, although it can leverage visual feedback within a body-centered reference frame to adapt. Further, in unimpaired adults, the dynamic localization abilities of the thumb and index finger are related.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalProprioceptionPsychomotor PerformanceRoboticsThumbAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultHand functionProprioceptive adaptationRobotic evaluationSensorimotor assessmentStroke rehabilitationThumb proprioception

Identifiers

PMID41521315
PMCPMC12791052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.