SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026
Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty in patients with hip dysplasia: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physically Constrained Dual-Branch Front-End Optimization for DDH-Oriented Surgical Robot Navigation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review summarizes radiographic, clinical and patient reported outcomes following robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty (RAA-THA) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), with comparisons to conventional (C-THA) and navigation (N-THA) techniques. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched for studies on DDH patients undergoing RAA-THA. Outcomes assessed included radiographic accuracy, patient-reported outcome-measures (PROMs), intraoperative outcomes, and complications. Eleven studies were included, analyzing 1150 hips (641 RAA-THA, 383 C-THA, 126 N-THA) with a median patient age of 60.5 years, and median BMI of 24.6. DDH severity was distributed as 59.6% Crowe I, 25.3% Crowe II/III hips, and 15.1% Crowe IV hips. Comparative studies among Crowe I-III hips showed significantly lower errors in cup inclination and anteversion with RAA-THA compared to both C-THA and N-THA. RAA-THA also achieved greater accuracy in restoring the center of rotation for Crowe I-III, but no difference was observed in Crowe IV hips. No significant differences were found in short-term PROMs, and intraoperative outcomes and complication rates were comparable between groups. RAA-THA may improve cup placement accuracy in Crowe I-III hips compared to C-THA and N-THA. However, the accuracy of Crowe IV hips remains unclear, with limited evidence available. Furthermore, radiographic benefits did not translate into significant differences in short-term PROMs, intraoperative outcomes, or complication rates. Future studies should include larger cohorts of patients with severe dysplasia and provide longer follow-up to better evaluate the efficacy and implant survivorship of RAA-THA in these complex cases. Level of Evidence: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41521308What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.