ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Systemic Treatments Impact Bone Quality in a Preclinical Model of Mixed Femoral Metastases.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bone Quality Heterogeneity in Mixed Femoral Metastases Revealed by Stimulated Raman Scattering Spectromicroscopy.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skeletal metastases disrupt bone remodeling, compromising mechanical integrity and increasing fracture risk. Cancer therapies can further influence bone quality. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of systemic cancer therapies (docetaxel (DTX) and zoledronic acid (ZA)) on bone quality in a preclinical model of mixed femoral metastases. Mixed metastases were induced in 5-6-week-old athymic male rats via intracardiac injection of luciferase-transfected ACE-1 canine prostate cancer cells (day 0). Healthy and inoculated rats were randomly assigned to receive no treatment, DTX (5 mg/kg), or ZA (60 μg/kg) on day 10. Tumor development was confirmed with bioluminescence imaging (day 14 and 21). Animals were euthanized on day 21. Bilateral femora were excised and underwent μCT scanning. Trabecular bone in the left femora was segmented for microstructural analysis. The left distal femora were then cut to 1 cm length and stained with barium sulfate for high-resolution μCT imaging to assess microdamage. The cut femora were then loaded to failure under axial compression. The right femora were processed for histology to evaluate bone histoarchitecture and verify tumor presence. DTX, despite lower bone mineral density, bone volume fraction, and trabecular number, showed reduced microdamage accumulation and improved load to failure in inoculated animals. ZA improved microstructural parameters, reduced damage volume fraction, and enhanced load to failure compared to inoculated untreated animals. These findings highlight the differential impact of cancer therapies on the quality of healthy and metastatic bone. Understanding these effects is essential for optimizing treatment strategies and minimizing skeletal complications secondary to skeletal metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41521280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.