ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2026
The dignity of the corpse: an explanation.
Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In medico-legal literature, the notion of the "dignity of the corpse" is frequently used as a narrative device, almost romantic in nature, aimed at highlighting the values attributed to it and thereby justifying its defense. The most common explanations tend to focus on its strictly practical effects (in relation to the living), either by pointing to a certain inviolability or by emphasizing some consequences at a symbolic level. Intentionally or not, some of these theories undertake the bold task of explaining the consequences of a phenomenon (the death/dead binomial) while disregarding the study of the material object that sustains this phenomenon, as well as the phenomenon itself. This paper proposes a reflection on the parallels between human dignity (better understood) and the so-called dignity of the dead (practically unknown), advancing an argumentative model (ontological/anthropological) that defends the existence of a 'special dignity of the corpse'. This sui generis dignity demands a sui generis treatment, whose practical applications-both in forensic science and other biological disciplines-can only be determined subsequently, after undergoing moral scrutiny.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41521244What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.