Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41521244›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2026

The dignity of the corpse: an explanation.

Jorge A Guzmán Lozano

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jorge A Guzmán LozanoUniversity of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. jorgeguzmanlozano@uca.edu.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5425-6082

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In medico-legal literature, the notion of the "dignity of the corpse" is frequently used as a narrative device, almost romantic in nature, aimed at highlighting the values attributed to it and thereby justifying its defense. The most common explanations tend to focus on its strictly practical effects (in relation to the living), either by pointing to a certain inviolability or by emphasizing some consequences at a symbolic level. Intentionally or not, some of these theories undertake the bold task of explaining the consequences of a phenomenon (the death/dead binomial) while disregarding the study of the material object that sustains this phenomenon, as well as the phenomenon itself. This paper proposes a reflection on the parallels between human dignity (better understood) and the so-called dignity of the dead (practically unknown), advancing an argumentative model (ontological/anthropological) that defends the existence of a 'special dignity of the corpse'. This sui generis dignity demands a sui generis treatment, whose practical applications-both in forensic science and other biological disciplines-can only be determined subsequently, after undergoing moral scrutiny.

Indexed as

PersonhoodRespectCadaverHumansCorpseDignityEthicsHuman corpseLegal medicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.