ReviewBone research2026
Biologics for bone regeneration: advances in cell, protein, gene, and mRNA therapies.
Review in Bone research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Porcelain-clay-inspired microsphere hydrogel bioink facilitates bone regeneration via immune-osteogenic regulation.Bioactive materials · 2027Article
- Evolution of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Contemporary Advances and Future Directions.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- Skeletal stem and progenitor cell niche organization, regulation and repair.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- Hydrogel Implementing Drug Delivery in Cranial Bone Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- [Adjunctive therapies in geriatric ankle fracture patients].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Spatiotemporal immunomodulation with programmable biomaterials to promote musculoskeletal tissue regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Orthobiologics in Trauma: Current Trends, Future Directions, and Regenerative Strategies.Cureus · 2026Review
- Hydrogels for Bone Repair: Construction Strategies and Applications.Smart medicine · 2026Review
- How Emerging Nanomaterials are Effective in Bone Regeneration?International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Advanced biomaterial-based approaches for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.Open life sciences · 2026Article
- Huoxue Jiegu compound capsule accelerates tibial fracture healing via angiogenesis-driven repair mechanisms.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone fractures represent a significant global healthcare burden. Although fractures typically heal on their own, some fail to regenerate properly, leading to nonunion, a condition that causes prolonged disability, morbidity, and mortality. The challenge of treating nonunion fractures is further complicated in patients with underlying bone disorders where systemic and local factors impair bone healing. Traditional treatment approaches, including autografts, allografts, xenografts, and synthetic biomaterials, face limitations such as donor site pain, immune rejection, and insufficient mechanical strength, underscoring the need for alternative strategies. Biologic therapies have emerged as promising tools to enhance bone regeneration by leveraging the body's natural healing processes. This review explores the critical role of conventional and emerging biologics in fracture healing. We categorize biologic therapies into protein-based treatments, gene and transcript therapies, small molecules, peptides, and cell-based therapies, highlighting their mechanisms of action, advantages, and clinical relevance. Finally, we examine the potential applications of biologics in treating fractures associated with bone disorders such as osteoporosis, osteogenesis imperfecta, rickets, osteomalacia, Paget's disease, and bone tumors. By integrating biologic therapies with existing biomaterial-based strategies, these innovative approaches have the potential to transform clinical management and improve outcomes for patients with difficult-to-heal fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.