ReviewBone research2026
Electric field stimulation-responsive hydrogels for bone regeneration: from mechanisms to applications.
Review in Bone research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aptamer-functionalized EGCG nanocarrier for neutrophil-targeted AKBA delivery promotes anxiety-related fracture healing.Bioactive materials · 2027Article
- Oxygen-vacancy-engineered t-ZnO-CeOBioactive materials · 2026Article
- Regulating Cells Fate and Function to Facilitate Bone Regeneration via Designing Programmable Bio-Interactive Materials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Bioactive Electrode System With External Connectivity for Electrically Augmented Bone Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Defect-Mediated Sonodynamic Catalysis on Calcium-Deficient Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles Coordinating Bacterial Elimination and Bone Regeneration against Osteomyelitis.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- 3D-Printed Piezoionic/Bioelectronic Hydrogel for Electro-Metabolic Regulation of Osteogenic Differentiation.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The continuous extension of human life expectancy and the global trend of population aging have contributed to a marked increase in the incidence of musculoskeletal diseases, with fractures and osteoporosis being prominent examples. Consequently, promoting bone regeneration is a crucial medical challenge that demands immediate attention. As early as the mid-20th century, researchers revealed that electrical stimulation could effectively promote the healing and regeneration of bone tissue. This is achieved by mimicking the endogenous electric field within bone tissue, which influences cellular behavior and molecular mechanisms. In recent years, electroactive hydrogels responsive to electric field stimulation have been developed and applied to regulate cell functions at different stages of bone regeneration. This paper elaborates on the regulatory effects of electrical stimulation on MSCs, macrophages, and vascular endothelial cells during the process of bone regeneration. It also involves the activation of relevant ion channels and signaling pathways. Subsequently, it comprehensively reviews various electric-field-responsive hydrogels developed in recent years, covering aspects such as material selection, preparation methods, characteristics, and their applications in bone regeneration. Ultimately, it provides an objective summary of the existing deficiencies in hydrogel materials and research, and looks ahead to future development directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.