Observational studyThe journal of pain2026
Which is More Predictive of Mortality-Pain Severity or Pain Interference? Evidence from 20-Year Longitudinal Data.
Observational study in The journal of pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Presurgical immune biomarkers associated with pain intensity and pain interference recovery after total knee arthroplasty: findings from the PRIME-KNEE study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic pain is highly prevalent, costly, and has significant impact on individuals' quality of life, yet evidence on its relationship with mortality remains inconsistent. While most prior studies have focused on the presence and severity of pain, relatively little attention has been given to the distinct role of pain interference (i.e., limitations in daily activities due to pain) in predicting mortality risk. Furthermore, potential differences in the pain-mortality relationship across socio-demographic subgroups remain understudied. This study examines whether pain severity or pain interference is more strongly associated with all-cause mortality among U.S. adults aged 51 and older and explores whether these associations vary by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status (i.e., education, wealth), and sex. Using 20 years of longitudinal data from the Health and Retirement Study (1998-2018, N=19,487), this study fits Cox proportional hazards models to estimate mortality risk and includes multiplicative interaction terms to assess sociodemographic heterogeneity. Findings show that in fully adjusted models, pain severity itself is not significantly associated with increased risk of mortality, but pain interference is (Hazard Ratio: 1.33; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.27-1.39). The associations between pain interference and mortality risk vary only slightly by race/ethnicity, sex, education, and wealth. These results indicate that pain interference may be a strong risk factor for mortality- potentially more so than pain severity. Clinicians should attend more closely to pain interference as a potentially sensitive indicator of mortality risk among middle-aged and older adults. Interventions aimed at reducing the functional impacts of pain may offer meaningful benefits in improving longevity. PERSPECTIVE: Pain interference is a stronger predictor of mortality risk than pain severity in older adults. Clinicians should prioritize assessing and addressing the functional impacts of pain to potentially improve longevity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.