Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41520270›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2025

SMC6 expression & outcome of breast cancer.

Flavia Regina Rotea Mangone, Ana Cristina Victorino Krepischi, Ana Carolina Pavanelli, Pedro Henrique Fernandes Gatti, Dirce Maria Carraro, Maria A Nagai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Flavia Regina Rotea MangoneDepartment of Radiology and Oncology, Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Centro de Investigação Translacionalem Oncologia- CTO, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Cristina Victorino KrepischiDepartment of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Human Genome and Stem Cell Research Center, Laboratory of Human Genetics - LGH, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Carolina PavanelliDepartment of Radiology and Oncology, Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Centro de Investigação Translacionalem Oncologia- CTO, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro Henrique Fernandes GattiDepartment of Radiology and Oncology, Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Centro de Investigação Translacionalem Oncologia- CTO, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Dirce Maria CarraroNational Institute of Science and Technology in Oncogenomics and Therapeutic Innovation (INCITO-INOTE); Clinical and Functional Genomics Group, International Research Center/CIPE, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria A NagaiDepartment of Radiology and Oncology, Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Centro de Investigação Translacionalem Oncologia- CTO, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives Genetic instability is frequent in tumour cells and might occur due to an imbalance of homologous recombination (HR). HR is a crucial mechanism of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair that depends on the formation and resolution of Holliday junctions for genomic stability maintenance. The SMC6 complex with SMC5 is involved in DSB repair. We sought to investigate the association between SMC6 expression, genomic instability, and prognosis of breast cancer. Methods This was an observational retrospective cohort study. We assessed SMC6 expression and copy number variation (CNV) data measured by qRT-PCR and whole-genome comparative genomic hybridization in 33 women with breast cancer who are non-carriers of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. According to nuclear staining, the SMC6 protein expression was evaluated on a tissue microarrayer containing 481 samples classified as SMC6low (negative/weak) or SMC6high (moderate/strong). Results SMC6low tumours tend to show higher CNV. SMC6high group presented poorer disease-free survival than the SMC6low group (P=0.050), mainly for the luminal subtype (P=0.005). SMC6low/ERpos were protective biomarkers for recurrence. Interpretation & Conclusions There is a possible association between SMC6 expression and relapse of breast cancer, also suggesting that SMC6 abnormal expression may indicate tumour genetic instability in breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCell Cycle ProteinsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinComparative Genomic HybridizationDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomic InstabilityHumansMiddle AgedMutationBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsSMC6 protein, humanBiomarkerbreast cancerexpressiongenomic instabilityprognosisSMC6

Identifiers

PMID41520270
PMCPMC12826375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.