Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41520156›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2026

Actionable genomic landscape of biliary tract cancer in the Indian population.

Sewanti Limaye, Aditya Shreenivas, Darshana Patil, Soumil Vyas, Irene A George, Janani Sambath, Shambhavi Singh, Chetan Madre, Anjali Parab, Pritam Kataria and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genomic landscape and clinicopathological predictors of survival in gallbladder cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Sewanti LimayeDepartment of Medical and Precision Oncology, Sir H N Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai 422010, India.ORCID 0009-0003-4989-9117
Aditya ShreenivasDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Duarte, CA 422010, United States.
Darshana PatilDatar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, Maharashtra 422010, India.
Soumil VyasDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Sir H N Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai 51122, India.
Irene A GeorgeManipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India.
Janani SambathManipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India.
Shambhavi SinghDepartment of Medical and Precision Oncology, Sir H N Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai 422010, India.
Chetan MadreDepartment of Medical and Precision Oncology, Sir H N Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai 422010, India.
Anjali ParabDepartment of Medical and Precision Oncology, Sir H N Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai 422010, India.
Pritam KatariaDepartment of Medical and Precision Oncology, Sir H N Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai 422010, India.
Darshit ShahDepartment of Medical and Precision Oncology, Sir H N Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai 422010, India.
Niyati ShahDepartment of Medical and Precision Oncology, Sir H N Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai 422010, India.
Shaheenah DawoodMediclinic Parkview Hospital, Dubai 51122, United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Nitesh RohatgiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurugram 122002, India.
Ruturaj DeshpandeDepartment of Medical and Precision Oncology, Sir H N Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai 422010, India.
Aakriti DattaDatar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, Maharashtra 422010, India.
Humaid Al ShamsiFounder and Director of the Medical Oncology Service at Burjeel Medical City, 9054, United Arab Emirates.
Andrew GayaGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, University of London, Great Maze Pond SE1 9RT, London.
Ashok Kumar VaidDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology Medanta the Medicity, Gurugram 122001, India.
Shriniwas KulkarniDepartment of Medical Oncology Sahyadri Super Speciality Hospital, Pune 411004, India.
Senthil RajappaBasavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 13353, India.
Damian RiekeDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 13353, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0027-7977
Prashant KumarDatar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, Maharashtra 422010, India.
Rajan DatarDatar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, Maharashtra 422010, India.
Milind JavleDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, MD Anderson Centre in Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9158-0941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiliary tract cancers (BTCs), including gallbladder cancer (GBC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), are rare but aggressive malignancies with distinct molecular landscapes and poor prognoses. Genomic profiling has revealed significant molecular alterations, but the genomic landscape of BTC in the Indian population remains underexplored. This study aims to comprehensively characterize the mutation landscape of BTC in the Indian population.

methodsA total of 154 BTC cases, including 69 CCA and 85 GBC, were retrospectively analyzed using data collected from various targeted sequencing panels. Somatic mutations, copy number variations (CNVs), and gene fusions in key oncogenic and tumor suppressor genes were identified from these panel reports. Downstream analyses were performed to derive key biological insights, including pathway enrichment and mutual exclusivity and co-occurrence analyses of genomic alterations.

resultsTP53 was the most frequently mutated gene (53%), followed by KRAS (18%), ARID1A (9%), IDH1 (7%), and PIK3CA (7%). Recurrent amplifications were observed in MYC (12%) and ERBB2 (9%). Pathway enrichment analysis revealed significant dysregulation in the PI3K-AKT-mTOR, Notch, and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways. Notably, IDH1 mutations were primarily observed in CCA, while STK11 mutations were exclusive to GBC, highlighting distinct molecular characteristics between the two subtypes. PD-L1-negative tumors exhibited distinct genomic alterations, notably SMAD4 mutations, which were associated with reduced PD-L1 expression. This loss of SMAD4, involved in TGF-β signaling, could impair immune response regulation and facilitate immune evasion.

conclusionsThis study provides a comprehensive molecular profiling of BTCs in the Indian population, revealing key genomic alterations, subtype-specific differences, and associations with immune features. The findings underscore the importance of molecular profiling in guiding personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsBiliary Tract NeoplasmsGenomicsAgedDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedMutationRetrospective Studiesbiliary tract cancercholangiocarcinomagall bladdergenomic profilingIndian population

Identifiers

PMID41520156
PMCPMC12923113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.