ArticleJournal of analytical toxicology2026
Validation of a microsampling-compatible liquid-liquid extraction method for cannabinoid quantitation in 50 µL of whole blood using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Article in Journal of analytical toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently developed dried blood analysis methods for cannabinoid quantitation utilize small blood volumes, making them microsampling-compatible, but are limited by hematocrit-related bias for dried blood spots (DBSs) and higher consumable costs for volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS®). To address these issues, we developed a highly sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method capable of quantifying cannabinoids in 50 µL of liquid whole blood, providing a practical microsampling alternative to dried blood approaches. Using liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) with sodium hydroxide alkalinization and acetonitrile precipitation, followed by quantitative analysis on an Agilent 6495 liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, we achieved lower limits of quantitation (LLOQ) of 0.10 ng/mL for Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabinol (CBN), and cannabigerol (CBG), 0.20 ng/mL for cannabidiol (CBD), 0.50 ng/mL for 11-hydroxy-THC (11-OH-THC), and 1.0 ng/mL for 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THC-COOH). Calibration was linear from the LLOQ to 300 ng/mL for all analytes. To our knowledge, this is one of the first validated LLE approaches for cannabinoid quantitation in less than 100 µL of liquid whole blood. Further, it achieves sub-ng/mL sensitivity, exceeding the LLOQs of most published methods which require ≥100 µL of whole blood. We anticipate particular utility for our method in obtaining evidence from suspected impaired drivers at the roadside when paired with capillary microsampling, such as via finger prick. This approach enables measurement of THC levels at the time of driving, thereby overcoming current limitations, including the decrease in THC levels that occurs with delayed blood sampling, requirement for larger sample volumes (≥100 µL), and dependence on trained phlebotomists for venipuncture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.