Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41520123›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

The VA Rural Interprofessional Faculty Development Initiative: a qualitative evaluation guided by the RE-AIM framework.

Sarah Keithly, Paige Perry, Erica J Ho, Ryan A Sterling, Soumya Subramaniam, Shaina Coogan, Sarah E Shirley, George Sayre, Christian Helfrich, Charles Maynard and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Sarah KeithlyCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S Columbian Way, MS-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA. Sarah.Keithly@va.gov.
Paige PerryCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S Columbian Way, MS-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Erica J HoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, WA, Seattle, USA.
Ryan A SterlingCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S Columbian Way, MS-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Soumya SubramaniamVA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO, USA.
Shaina CooganCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S Columbian Way, MS-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Sarah E ShirleyCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S Columbian Way, MS-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
George SayreCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S Columbian Way, MS-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Christian HelfrichCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S Columbian Way, MS-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Charles MaynardCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S Columbian Way, MS-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Catherine P KaminetzkyOffice of Academic Affiliations, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
Erin L PatelOffice of Academic Affiliations, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
Joseph ChiovaroOffice of Academic Affiliations, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
Joel SchmidtOffice of Academic Affiliations, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
Rebecca StoutOffice of Academic Affiliations, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
Amber FisherBoise VA Medical Center, Boise, ID, USA.
Edwin S WongCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S Columbian Way, MS-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Megan MoldestadCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S Columbian Way, MS-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rural Interprofessional Faculty Development Initiative (RIFDI) is a longitudinal, multimodal training program designed to improve the quality of and capacity for health professions education in rural areas. This study evaluated RIFDI using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, with the intent of informing future implementation of this and similar faculty development programs.

methodsIn this descriptive qualitative study, we interviewed RIFDI participants from four program cohorts at different stages of completion. We analyzed data using rapid qualitative analysis and synthesized findings along domains corresponding to the RE-AIM framework.

resultsForty-one participants completed 49 interviews at mid-program (n = 21), program end (n = 16), and/or post-program (n = 12). Reach: Most participants learned about and joined RIFDI via nomination by their site's educational leadership. Participants were motivated to join by the professional-development opportunity and/or their existing involvement or interest in health professions education. EFFECTIVENESS: Participants reported improved educational expertise, practice, networking, and institutional knowledge. Adoption: Participants perceived leadership support, or lack thereof, and institutional barriers influenced program adoption at their site. IMPLEMENTATION: RIFDI's diverse curriculum was largely perceived as successful in developing professional competencies and networks. Program implementation was aided by blended learning, skilled facilitators, and a collaborative learning environment. Maintenance: Participants interviewed 12 months or more post-program reported continued use of acquired knowledge and skills, lasting relationships, and professional opportunities.

conclusionsRIFDI presents a promising model for interprofessional faculty development in distributed healthcare settings. Its curriculum of didactic, experiential, and collaborative learning provides multiple opportunities for teaching knowledge and skills development and building a community of practice. This study emphasized the importance of institutional support and context in fostering program reach and adoption, and the value of interprofessional networks and blended learning in augmenting program effectiveness, implementation, and maintenance.

Indexed as

Faculty, MedicalInterprofessional RelationsRural Health ServicesStaff DevelopmentHumansProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsFaculty developmentHealth professions educationInterprofessional educationProgram evaluationRE-AIM

Identifiers

PMID41520123
PMCPMC12882197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.