Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41520121›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Visual information potentiates incremental VOR adaptation.

Eva Riché, Vincent Lagadec, Denis Pélisson, Clément Désoche, Caroline Froment Tilikete, Ruben Hermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eva RichéLyon Neuroscience Research Center, IMPACT Team, INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Lyon I University, Lyon, France.
Vincent LagadecLyon Neuroscience Research Center, IMPACT Team, INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Lyon I University, Lyon, France.
Denis PélissonLyon Neuroscience Research Center, IMPACT Team, INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Lyon I University, Lyon, France.
Clément DésocheLyon Neuroscience Research Center, Neuro-Immersion Platform, INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Bron, France.
Caroline Froment TiliketeLyon Neuroscience Research Center, IMPACT Team, INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Lyon I University, Lyon, France.
Ruben HermannLyon Neuroscience Research Center, IMPACT Team, INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Lyon I University, Lyon, France. ruben.hermann@chu-lyon.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) response to a given head rotation can be modified through adaptation by inducing a visuo-vestibular mismatch. Incremental velocity error protocols allow for rapid unilateral VOR adaptation in the everyday-life range of head movement high velocities. However, these protocols are conducted in darkness, with the sole visual stimulation of the central retina being provided by the fixated target. This study aimed to investigate whether enhanced visual information can improve incremental VOR adaptation, starting with an assessment of the feasibility to implement the incremental velocity error adaptation protocols within a virtual reality environment.

methodsEighteen participants with normal vestibular function were recruited. Two different visual conditions were designed for adaptation: (1) a Uniform condition where a red fixation dot was the only salient cue displayed within a grey void, emulating the original Incremental Velocity Error protocol, and (2) an Enriched condition where the fixation dot was overlayed on a structured natural visual environment. Participants performed both conditions in two sessions separated by at least three days, following a randomly assigned order and side of adaptation. During the adaptation phase, unilateral passive head impulses were performed while the participant fixated the dot with a progressively increasing visuo-vestibular mismatch: the gain of visual feedback (dot and background) increased by 0.1 every 30 head impulses, from the normal unity gain until a gain demand of 2 was reached (visual scene rotation twice as large as the head movement). Pre- and post-adaptation VOR gain was measured during head impulse testing in dark.

resultsIn the Uniform condition, the mean VOR gain was significantly higher after adaptation compared to before (1.41 in Post vs. 1.14 in Pre, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between pre-adaptation VOR gains measured in darkness between the Uniform and Enriched conditions (respectively 1.14 and 1.11, t = 1.331, p = 0.201). But importantly, there was a significant interaction between condition (Uniform vs. Enriched) and phase (Pre vs. Post) (F = 13.163, p = 0.002) with a 32.5% VOR gain increase in the Enriched condition compared to a 24.1% VOR gain increase in the Uniform condition. No significant changes in post-adaptation VOR gain were observed on the contralateral side in either condition.

conclusionVirtual reality can be used to induce VOR adaptation using Incremental Velocity Error protocols. Moreover, using an enriched visual environment for inducing the visuo-vestibular mismatch potentiates VOR gain adaptation.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalFeedback, SensoryReflex, Vestibulo-OcularVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHead MovementsHumansMalePhotic StimulationVirtual RealityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41520121
PMCPMC12882385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.