Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41520104›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026

Municipal deprivation and cardiometabolic outcomes in Mexican adults: findings from ENSANUT 2021-2023.

David Contreras-Loya, Martín Romero-Martínez, Paola Abril Campos-Rivera, Héctor Arreola-Ornelas, Linda Morales-Juárez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David Contreras-LoyaTecnologico de Monterrey, Institute for Obesity Research, Unit of Health Public Policy, Mexico City, Mexico.
Martín Romero-MartínezInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Centro de Investigación en Evaluación y Encuestas, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Paola Abril Campos-RiveraTecnologico de Monterrey, Institute for Obesity Research, Unit of Health Public Policy, Mexico City, Mexico.
Héctor Arreola-OrnelasTecnologico de Monterrey, Institute for Obesity Research, Unit of Health Public Policy, Mexico City, Mexico.
Linda Morales-JuárezTecnologico de Monterrey, Institute for Obesity Research, Unit of Health Public Policy, Mexico City, Mexico. linda.morales@tec.mx.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiometabolic diseases are rising rapidly in low- and middle-income countries. Managing them requires a full cascade of care: early detection, treatment, and long-term control. Yet in Mexico, many adults are not reached by effective care, especially in poorer municipalities where health services are scarce. These local inequities mean that the municipality of residence can strongly determine whether their condition is detected, treated, or controlled.

methodsWe used the Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey 2021–2023 (ENSANUT), a sequence of independent national probabilistic, nationally and regional representative surveys with a total sample size of 32,087 adults (20 + years old). Municipal deprivation was assessed using the Density-Independent Social Lag Index (DISLI). Primary outcomes were diabetes identification, treatment, and glycemic control (the diabetes care cascade), along with indicators for hypertension, adiposity, metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, and kidney function. We used survey-weighted descriptive statistics and regression analysis to quantify disparities in outcomes across levels of municipal deprivation.

resultsWe found that screening participation and disease prevalence for diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia varied little among Mexican municipalities. However, two separate gradients were apparent: a steep gradient in diabetes control and an inverse gradient in metabolic risk. Adjusted estimates for diabetes control (HbA1c < 7%) dropped from 31.8% in the least to 13.7% in the most deprived areas. By contrast, the wealthier municipalities had higher levels of obesity and metabolic syndrome. Meanwhile, control of hypertension was equally poor (33% of treated cases) across all strata.

conclusionsDeprivation had no impact on case finding at the local level, but it was related to significantly worse glycemic control. Those from poor areas were much less likely to achieve glycemic targets, reflecting structural care deficits. Higher obesity and metabolic risk in wealthier settings, however, point to the need for prevention efforts to focus on urban obesogenic environments. To narrow the inequity gap, proportionate universalism is needed: greater support for managing diabetes in disadvantaged towns and broader prevention strategies in advantaged ones.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusAdultDyslipidemiasFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMetabolic SyndromeMexicoMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysObesityPrevalenceSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthDiabetes cascadeHealth inequitiesMetabolic controlMexicoMunicipal deprivationStructural determinants

Identifiers

PMID41520104
PMCPMC12828946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.