ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2026
Real world clinical practice of lecanemab at PUMCH dementia cohort: focus on dynamic imaging and biomarker evolution.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anti-Amyloid Monoclonal Antibodies in Early Alzheimer Disease: Lecanemab and Donanemab.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Integrating frailty into decision-making for disease-modifying therapies in Alzheimer's disease: a proposed expert-opinion based approach.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLecanemab is an anti-Aβ antibody approved in China for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia. Real-world application requires comprehensive assessment beyond MMSE scores, considering factors like ARIA risk. This single-center, real-world study aims to evaluate its efficacy in an expanded population, observe biomarker changes, and assess its safety profile in clinical practice.
methodsWe recruited adults aged 40-90 with early AD from the PUMCH Dementia Cohort. A total of 42 patients received lecanemab treatment, of whom 29 completed the 6-month treatment evaluation. Participants had confirmed amyloid and tau pathology and met clinical criteria (CDR ≤ 1, CDR-SB ≤ 8and MMSE ≥ 18). Comprehensive assessments included neuropsychological testing, CSF and plasma biomarkers (Lumipulse G1200), multi-sequence 3T MRI (volumetric and ALPS index analysis), and amyloid/tau PET imaging (Centiloid quantification). All were monitored for adverse reactions. Matched control groups (matched for sex, age, APOE genotype, disease severity, and baseline therapy) were established for comparison of longitudinally changes in cognitive function, daily living ability and structure MRI.
resultsTreatment was effective even for patients with lower MMSE scores but still classified as having mild dementia by CDR. A significant median Centiloid reduction of 30.9 was observed, with a 24.1% amyloid PET negativity rate after six months. While scores on cognitive and functional scales (CDR-SB, ADL) significantly worsened, indicating disease progression, the rate of progression was significantly slower compared to the control group. Structural MRI showed significant volume reduction in multiple brain regions and increased ventricular volume post-treatment, with no statistically significant change in the ALPS value. The rate of brain volume reduction is faster than that in the control group. Plasma biomarker dynamics (Aβ
conclusionsThis study confirms the clinical efficacy, biomarker changes, and safety profile of lecanemab treatment over a 6-month period, demonstrating its positive therapeutic value and a favorable safety profile in the Chinese population with AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.