Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41520038›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

CNN-MLP framework for forest burned areas prediction using PSO-WOA algorithm.

Mohamed H Mousa, Abdullah M Algamdi, Yasser Fouad, Ahmed M Elshewey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohamed H MousaDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, 21493, Saudi Arabia. mhmousa@uj.edu.sa.
Abdullah M AlgamdiDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, 21493, Saudi Arabia.
Yasser FouadDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Information, Suez University, P.O.Box:43221, Suez, Egypt.
Ahmed M ElsheweyDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Information, Suez University, P.O.Box:43221, Suez, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3048-1920

Funding

University of Jeddah UJ-25-DR-20568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of the burned area from forest fires is essential for effective wildfire risk management and mitigation; however, this task remains challenging due to the highly nonlinear relationships and extreme skewness inherent in fire-weather data. This study proposes an optimized hybrid deep learning framework that integrates a Convolutional Neural Network and a Multilayer Perceptron (CNN–MLP) with metaheuristic optimization to enhance burned-area regression accuracy. A wrapper-based Binary Firefly Algorithm (BFA) is employed to identify the most informative subset of meteorological, fire-weather, and spatial features, reducing redundancy and improving generalization. To further optimize model performance, a hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization–Whale Optimization Algorithm (PSO–WOA) is used to tune the hyperparameters of the CNN–MLP architecture automatically. Experiments conducted on the UCI Forest Fires dataset demonstrate that the proposed PSO–WOA–CNN–MLP model significantly outperforms optimized baseline deep learning models, including CNN, MLP, LSTM, and GRU. The proposed model achieves very low prediction errors (Mean Squared Error (MSE) = 0.0093, Mean Absolute Error (MAE = 0.0767, Median Absolute Error (MedAE = 0.0616, Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE = 0.0066) and an exceptional coefficient of determination (R² = 99.89%), indicating near-perfect agreement between predicted and observed burned areas.

Indexed as

Burned area estimation, hybrid CNN-MLP modelCNN-MLPDeep learningEnvironmental monitoringFeature selectionForest fire predictionHyperparameter tuningIntelligent wildfire management

Identifiers

PMID41520038
PMCPMC12876858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.