Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41520017›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A drift-aware RS

Gomathi Sakthivel, Anitha Kumari Kumarasamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gomathi SakthivelDr.N.G.P. Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, India. s.gomathi4321@gmail.com.
Anitha Kumari KumarasamyPSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time intrusion detection in heterogeneous Internet of Things (IoT) networks involves continuously monitoring diverse connected devices and communication protocols to promptly identify malicious activities or anomalies. Due to varied device capabilities, dynamic topologies, and resource constraints, these systems leverage lightweight AI-driven analytics, edge processing, and adaptive security models to ensure minimal latency. Effective detection enhances resilience, safeguards sensitive data, and maintains seamless IoT operations in mission-critical environments. We propose a stage-specific Recursive Sparse & Relevance-based Feature Selection (RS2FS) and a confidence-gated Support Vector Machine (SVM) → SVM → ANFIS cascade for real-time intrusion detection in heterogeneous IoT networks. RS2FS combines elastic-net screening, MI ∩ mRMR relevance, stability selection, and margin-aware recursive pruning to yield compact, non-redundant feature sets per cascade stage. The cascade accepts easy cases with calibrated SVMs and routes ambiguous, family-localized traffic to per-family ANFIS rules, providing interpretable subtype decisions. Evaluated on CICIoT2023 with scenario-held-out splits (5 × grouped CV), our model attains Macro-F1 = 0.962, Macro-AUC = 0.991, Balanced Accuracy = 0.963, MCC = 0.952, Brier = 0.038, and ECE = 0.012 at 6.3 ms CPU latency per window with a 7.8 MB footprint. Class-wise F1 shows consistent gains: Benign 0.991, DDoS 0.984, DoS 0.958, Recon 0.961, Web 0.937, Brute Force 0.951, Data Exfiltration 0.921, Botnet 0.942. Cascade behavior explains the speed-accuracy trade-off: 68% of windows are resolved at Stage-1 (F1 0.985, 3.38 ms), 22% at Stage-2 (F1 0.962, 7.73 ms), and only 10% escalate to ANFIS (F1 0.936, 23 ms). Against strong baselines, we improve Macro-F1 by + 1.9 pp over SVM-only (0.943), + 1.7 pp over XGBoost (0.945), and + 1.1 pp over a small 1D-CNN (0.951); bootstrap tests show significance (p < 0.01). Unlike existing IoT IDS approaches that rely on single-stage classifiers or one-time, global feature selection, our framework introduces two fundamental advances. First, the proposed RS2FS mechanism performs stage-specific, stability-aware, and margin-guided feature reduction, addressing the gaps of redundancy, volatility, and non-adaptiveness found in prior MI-, mRMR-, or L1-based selection methods. Second, the confidence-gated SVM → SVM → ANFIS cascade introduces a new routing paradigm where high-margin "easy" traffic is settled early, while only low-confidence, ambiguous windows are escalated to fuzzy reasoning overcoming the limitations of conventional hybrid SVM-ANFIS systems that apply the same classifier depth to all samples. Together with integrated open-set rejection and drift micro-adaptation, these contributions position the framework as a fundamentally new IDS architecture for heterogeneous IoT environments. The open-set guard achieves AUROC 0.981 and TPR@1%FPR 0.912 with 4.6% reject rate. Robustness holds under + 5% timestamp jitter (0.957), ± 10% packet-size noise (0.955), and 10% missing features (0.949). Interpretable ANFIS rules highlight payload-entropy, MQTT topic-depth, and DWT-energy interactions. Overall, the framework delivers accurate, calibrated, interpretable, and fast IDS suitable for deployment in modern IoT environments.

Indexed as

Adaptive Security ModelCICIoT2023Confidence-gated support vector machineElastic-net screeningInternet of ThingsRecursive sparse & relevance-based feature selection

Identifiers

PMID41520017
PMCPMC12855787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.