ArticleScientific reports2026
A survey of physicians perceptions of disability outcomes after hypothetical traumatic brain injury.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to quantify physician perceptions of health utility states after traumatic brain injury (TBI) using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE). Conducted via a cross-sectional, web-based survey, it involved 646 board-certified physicians from specialties such as neurology, neurosurgery, surgical critical care, pulmonary critical care, and physical medicine & rehabilitation, with 528 completing all seven GOSE scenarios. The survey employed a standard gamble approach to assess health utility preferences for hypothetical outcomes one-year post-TBI, where physicians chose between living in a specific GOSE state or a gamble with a 50% chance of perfect health and a 50% chance of immediate death. Results showed that median health utility values for GOSE states ranged from - 1 (worse than death) to 1 (full health). Physicians rated lower GOSE states with diminished utility, perceiving levels 2 and 3 as worse than death, and noted a significant decline in perceived quality of life between GOSE 5 and 4, indicating increased sensitivity to greater dependence on caregivers. Physicians assigned lower health utility values to less severe disability states compared to the general population, as well as TBI caregivers and survivors reported in the literature, highlighting potential biases that could impact clinical decision-making. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to address physician perceptions, aiming to improve shared decision-making and patient-centered care in TBI treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.