ArticleScientific reports2026
Mechanical and radiation shielding assessment of high-density/magnetite-cementitious plaster for repair and retrofit of nuclear power plant structures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concrete plays a critical role in nuclear power plants (NPPs) as structural material and radiation shielding. Severe defects during construction of NPP concrete could lead to catastrophic leakages. Therefore, cement plaster propably with acceptable radiation protection could be a good solution as a repairing technique. Thus, this study investigates the mechanical and radiation shielding properties of non-conventional cementitious plaster incorporating magnetite powder as a partial/full replacement for traditional sand. Five cement plaster mixtures were proposed with varying proportions of magnetite powder and sand, in which their mechanical and radiation attenuation properties were analyzed. Experimental evaluations including workability, density, compressive strength, and gamma-ray attenuation were investigated. Furthermore, γ-ray and fast neutron shielding has been evaluated using software programs such as EpiXS, NXCom, and MRCsC. Results showed that incorporating magnetite powder in cement plaster production lowers the compactness of the matrix by up to 46.2%. Consequently, the compressive strength was generally decreased by up to 65.4% with increased magnetite content. However, the density of the plaster was increased by up to 48.7% compared to traditional cement plaster. Furthermore, owing to increased density, the radiation shielding efficiency of magnetite cement plaster was generally enhanced. Cement plaster with 100% magnetite content achieved superior linear attenuation coefficient (LAC) for gamma rays with 264% increase at 0.01 MeV and 43% increase at 10 MeV compared to the traditional sand plaster. Also it acquired better fast neutron shielding performance, with a macroscopic removal cross-section (Σ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.