ArticleScientific reports2026
Plant growth point localization via epoch-based prior annealing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate localization of plant growth points is essential for precision agriculture applications, including electro-weeding and laser weeding. While crop and weed detection has been extensively studied, existing methods focus primarily on object-level recognition and often neglect fine-grained growth point localization. To address this limitation, we propose a novel training strategy, epoch-based prior annealing (EPA), which incorporates the excess green minus excess red (ExG-ExR) index as prior knowledge and introduces schedule factor and gain factor to effectively steer keypoint regression. The experimental results show that incorporating EPA improves keypoint localization performance, with mAP50 increasing by 0.024 and mAP50:95 by 0.011, while maintaining bounding box detection performance. The parameter sensitivity experiments confirmed that both excessively strong and weak guidance can hinder training. Furthermore, analysis of parameters and computational cost shows that the additional overhead introduced by the EPA strategy accounts for less than 0.5% of the total, and be considered negligible. In summary, the proposed EPA strategy significantly improves the accuracy, robustness, and generalizability of plant and growth point detection models, offering a practical and scalable solution for precision agricultural applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.