ArticleTheory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften2026
A theoretical framework for extrapolating Andrographis paniculata mechanisms to the novel CIRDD and IROD diabetes clusters.
Article in Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The newly described CIRDD and IROD clusters of Type 2 Diabetes represent clinically meaningful phenotypes, yet no subtype-specific molecular or omics datasets currently exist to define their mechanisms. This study introduces a predictive extrapolation framework to infer how phytocompounds from Andrographis paniculata may interact with these subtypes by mapping established pathways of insulin resistance, β-cell dysfunction, and obesity-driven inflammation onto CIRDD- and IROD-relevant axes. From the broader T2DM network, ten hub proteins (INS, AKT1, TNF, IL6, MMP9, and others) were prioritized based on functional importance and subsequently assigned to each subtype according to their documented physiological roles. Docking analysis, supported by redocking validation against high-resolution crystallographic complexes, enabled assessment of theoretical ligand-protein interactions. The model predicts that CIRDD may be primarily modulated through β-cell regulatory hubs (INS, AKT1), whereas IROD appears more strongly influenced through inflammatory-metabolic hubs (TNF, TLR4, MMP9). Apigenin and andrographolide displayed the strongest predicted affinities (binding energies ≤ -8.5 kcal/mol), and redocking yielded RMSD values below 2.0 Å, supporting the reliability of the docking protocol. Overall, this work proposes a theoretical, biologically anchored framework for predicting subtype-specific phytochemical mechanisms in the absence of direct molecular datasets. While experimental validation is required, the approach offers a rational basis for prioritizing plant-derived candidates for CIRDD and IROD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41519973What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.