ArticleScientific reports2026
Adaptive robotic arm control through digital twin integration and hybrid neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a novel digital twin-driven intelligent robotic arm adaptive control system that integrates hybrid neural network architectures to address the limitations of traditional feedback control mechanisms in complex operational environments. The proposed approach uniquely combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and Transformer modules through a three-way collaborative optimization mechanism, distinguishing it from existing two-component hybrid architectures. The digital twin framework establishes bidirectional closed-loop mapping between physical and virtual domains, enabling real-time predictive optimization and continuous learning capabilities. Comprehensive experimental validation using a six-degree-of-freedom UR10e robotic arm demonstrates significant performance improvements: tracking accuracy of 98.73 ± 0.24% (mean ± std, n = 30 trials), response time improvements of 35.2%, and disturbance rejection capabilities enhanced by 42.3% compared to conventional PID and computed torque control methods (p < 0.01). Additional simulations on three robotic platforms (ABB IRB 6640, KUKA KR 10, Fanuc M-20iA) confirm the generalizability of the approach. The system maintains exceptional stability across diverse payload configurations (0.5-8kg) and external disturbance scenarios, with training data efficiency superior to standalone architectures by requiring 40% fewer samples for equivalent performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.