ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Evaluation of two easy-to-implement digital breathing interventions in the context of daily stress levels in a series of N-of-1 trials: results from the Anti-Stress Intervention Among Physicians (ASIP) study.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital N-of-1 trials and their application in experimental physiology.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- Lower breathing frequencies in personalized slow-paced breathing enhance relaxation and reduce arousal.iScience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physicians face intense work-related stress, which can harm their health, increase the risk of medical errors, lower healthcare quality, and increase costs within the healthcare system. In this 4-week intervention study, individual-level and population-level effects of two short and easy-to-perform breathing exercises designed to reduce stress are evaluated among 76 physicians in residency in Germany in a series of N-of-1 trials. Levels of stress and levels of stress expected for the following day were assessed electronically every day via the StudyU App (protocol adherence: 91.9%). Average intervention effects were estimated using Bayesian linear regression models. They were overall small on the population level, but they showed large heterogeneity between individuals, with strong effects for selected individuals, with stress reduction of up to 3 points on a 1 to 10 stress scale. Thirty-one participants benefited from the anti-stress exercises. Three (mindfulness breathing) and seven participants (box breathing) had a ≥70% probability for a daily stress reduction of ≥0.5 points and thereby fulfilled our responder criteria. Of the 17 participants who completed the follow-up survey about 4.5 months after completion of the individual N-of-1 trials, 58% reported that they felt they had benefited from the intervention and 42% planned to use it in the future. The results highlight the value of personalized perspectives: while the studied interventions showed only small positive benefits for the "average person", they may well help actual individual persons, here 10 of 76 or even 31 of 76 participants.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.