ArticleNature communications2026
Pruning random resistive memory for optimizing analog AI.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Dual-Programmable 2M NOR Flash Architecture for Energy-Efficient In-Memory Computing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Pruning random resistive memory for optimizing analog AI.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Resistive Switching Devices for Neuromorphic Computing: From Foundations to Chip Level Innovations.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of AI models has intensified concerns over energy consumption. Analog in-memory computing with resistive memory offers a promising, energy-efficient alternative, yet its practical deployment is hindered by programming challenges and device non-idealities. Here, we propose a software-hardware co-design that trains randomly weighted resistive-memory neural networks via edge-pruning topology optimization. Software-wise, we tailor the network topology to extract high-performing sub-networks without precise weight tuning, enhancing robustness to device variations and reducing programming overhead. Hardware-wise, we harness the intrinsic stochasticity of resistive-memory electroforming to generate large-scale, low-cost random weights. Implemented on a 40 nm resistive memory chip, our co-design yields accuracy improvements of 17.3% and 19.9% on Fashion-MNIST and Spoken Digit, respectively, and a 9.8% precision-recall AUC improvement on DRIVE, while reducing energy consumption by 78.3%, 67.9%, and 99.7%. We further demonstrate broad applicability across analog memory technologies and scalability to ResNet-50 on ImageNet-100.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.