ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning-derived stage-specific design rules for metal-organic framework selection in seasonal hydrogen storage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Economic viability of seasonal hydrogen storage depends on minimizing recovery costs as reservoir pressure and hydrogen purity decline during withdrawal, necessitating pressure-swing adsorption purification where adsorbent selectivity directly impacts separation efficiency. Existing metal-organic framework (MOF) screening evaluates performance under idealized conditions such as equimolar mixtures and single pressures, providing no guidance for matching adsorbent geometry to evolving pressure and composition profiles during withdrawal. We establish quantitative, stage-specific design rules using machine learning and explainable AI on 712 experimentally synthesized MOF structures across four withdrawal stages spanning 60 to 25 bar and 98% to 65% hydrogen purity. Optimal geometric parameters controlling selectivity shift systematically across pressure and composition conditions: accessible volume dominates at high pressure, void fraction controls intermediate stages, and pore aperture governs low-pressure performance. Multiple viable pathways at each stage provide synthesis flexibility. These stage-resolved criteria enable MOF selection based on realistic operating conditions rather than idealized scenarios.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.