Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41519861›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Integration of large vision language models for efficient post-disaster damage assessment and reporting.

Zhaohui Chen, Elyas Asadi Shamsabadi, Sheng Jiang, Luming Shen, Daniel Dias-da-Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhaohui ChenSchool of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0833-5496
Elyas Asadi ShamsabadiSchool of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7314-5217
Sheng JiangState Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210024, China.
Luming ShenSchool of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6243-4304
Daniel Dias-da-CostaSchool of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. daniel.diasdacosta@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2950-2237

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional natural disaster response involves significant coordinated teamwork, where speed and efficiency are key. Nonetheless, human limitations can delay critical actions and inadvertently increase human and economic losses. Agentic Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) offer an avenue to address this challenge, with the potential for substantial socio-economic impact, particularly by improving resilience and resource access in underdeveloped regions. We introduce DisasTeller, a multi-LVLM-powered framework designed to automate tasks in post-disaster management, including on-site assessment, emergency alerts, resource allocation, and recovery planning. By coordinating four specialised LVLM agents with GPT-4 as the core, DisasTeller can accelerate disaster response activities, reducing human execution time and structuring information flow. Our evaluation shows both benefits and challenges: while DisasTeller streamlines coordination and report generation, errors in early-stage assessments may propagate downstream, highlighting the need for human validation and improved LVLM accuracy. This framework acts as a complementary support system to expert teams, bridging the gap between traditional response methods and emerging LVLM-driven efficiency, while highlighting the importance of continued refinement and collaboration for safe, trustworthy deployment.

Indexed as

Disaster PlanningHumansLarge Language Models

Identifiers

PMID41519861
PMCPMC12886768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.