ArticleBioData mining2026
Genotype subtyping approach to identify unnoticed variants in diseases from GWAS data.
Article in BioData mining, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are vital for investigating single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in diseases. Comparisons of detected SNPs for the same disease between populations often reveal gaps, which are attributed to factors such as population, sample size, and rare variants, among others. We propose a method referred to as ‘Genotype Subtyping’ that is based on a classical GWAS to identify seed SNPs; each SNP stratifies cases and controls by its genotype, followed by a sub-GWAS per genotype while keeping the additional number of statistical tests low. We evaluated four databases and populations, including Crohn’s disease, schizophrenia, breast cancer, and type 2 diabetes. Our findings and simulations demonstrate that Genotype Subtyping identifies additional significant SNPs or highlights SNPs that increase their significance importantly in all tested diseases. Some of these SNPs have already shown associations with the disorders in other populations. This result suggests that additional associations not observed before can be potentially novel. For instance, we confirmed associations near CASC15 (rs7760611) with breast cancer and near NDUFAF4 (chr6:97339280) with schizophrenia, even though they initially fell short of genome-wide significance. Moreover, we noted a SNP near BUD13 (rs1263149) showing a potential link to type 2 diabetes. We demonstrate that Genotype Subtyping is highly sensitive and specific by positive and negative simulations. Our results underscore the reliability of Genotype Subtyping as a method for identifying and validating associations for specific phenotypes by reanalyzing GWAS data, ultimately facilitating target gene identification. The implementation is available in a GitHub repository ( https://github.com/vtrevino/Genotype_Subtyping ).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.