ArticleBMC psychology2026
Psychological resilience: the hidden key to managerial support and performance in teachers.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although managerial support, psychological resilience, and employee performance have been examined separately in the literature, studies integrating these variables into a single mediational framework particularly among physical education and sports teachers in Türkiye remain limited. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates the relationships among perceived managerial support, psychological resilience, and employee performance, and examines whether psychological resilience serves as a mediating mechanism. The research adopted a relational survey model, and the sample consisted of Physical Education and Sports Teachers working in Erzurum province. Data were collected using the Perceived Managerial Support Scale (Kottke & Sharafinski 1988; Özdemir, 2010), Employee Performance Scale (Kirkman & Rosen, 1999; Çöl, 2008), and Psychological Resilience Scale (Smith et al., 2008). Normality was confirmed, and analyses included Pearson correlations, CFA via AMOS 24, and Bootstrap-based regression using IBM SPSS 24. Findings revealed that perceived managerial support significantly and positively predicts both psychological resilience and employee performance. Moreover, psychological resilience demonstrated a significant mediating effect in the relationship between managerial support and performance. These results contribute to the field by identifying psychological resilience as a key mechanism explaining how managerial support enhances teachers’ performance, and highlight the practical importance of strengthening supportive leadership practices and resilience-building initiatives in educational settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.