ArticleBMC health services research2026
The imperative of digital competence in healthcare professionals: comparison between the North and South of Europe.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Employee perceptions of AI adoption across service domains in a Finnish public health and social care organization: a cross-sectional mixed-methods study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Barriers and enablers for health system reform.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital transformation in healthcare increasingly depends on the digitalisation of day-to-day clinical work, in particular on professionals’ ability to use electronic health records, telemedicine, and data-driven tools. However, gaps in digital competence and uneven access to training persist across Europe. This study examines how healthcare professionals understand and apply digital tools in clinical practice, and compares perceived barriers between Northern and Southern Europe.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional qualitative survey using a digital self-assessment questionnaire administered to 2,048 healthcare professionals from six European countries. The study was theoretically grounded in the European Digital Competence Framework for Citizens 2.0 (DigComp 2.0) and the eHealth Literacy Framework, and employed thematic analysis to interpret open-ended responses.
resultsFour key thematic areas emerged: remote patient care and monitoring; digital education and health management; transformation of clinical workflows; and data-driven diagnostics. Professionals in Northern Europe—especially Finland—described integrated digital systems, structured training, and institutional support. Participants in Southern Europe more often reported fragmented infrastructure, limited training opportunities, and organizational resistance. The most frequently cited barriers to digital adoption were lack of training (23%), time constraints (27%), limited resources (24%), and resistance to change (19%).
conclusionsHealthcare professionals widely view digital competence as essential for safe and effective care, but uptake is constrained by structural barriers and regional inequalities. Targeted investment in workforce training, protected time for skill development, and foundational digital infrastructure—particularly in Southern Europe and in resource-limited settings—is needed to support equitable digital transformation across European health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.