ArticleBMC medical education2026
Nationwide needs assessment on the potential use of virtual reality in teaching birth mechanics: perceptions of students and teaching professionals in midwifery and medicine in Germany.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA comprehensive understanding of birth mechanics is essential for safe and competent practice in obstetrics and midwifery. These dynamic, three-dimensional processes occur internally and are not directly observable, making them challenging to teach with traditional methods. Virtual Reality (VR) offers unique potential to visualize such complex, invisible mechanisms. This nationwide survey assessed the perceived need, curricular contexts, and preferred content for a high-fidelity VR application to teach birth mechanics in midwifery and medical education.
methodsAn anonymous, digital survey was distributed to all study programs in midwifery science and medicine in Germany via program coordinators, department heads, and teaching leads in obstetrics and gynecology. Separate questionnaires for students and teaching professionals included 17 items on demographics, prior VR experience, attitudes toward VR, curricular timing, relevant learning objectives, and prioritized birth mechanics deviations. Responses were collected using Likert scales and multiple-choice questions, with non-parametric group comparisons (Mann–Whitney U, Chi-square test) and Bonferroni correction.
resultsA total of 1,249 complete responses were analyzed with 22.4% (n = 280) teaching professionals and 77.6% (n = 969) students; 65.7% (n = 821) medicine, 34.3% (n = 428) midwifery. Overall, 76.3% reported a high or very high need for VR, and 90.2% held a positive or rather positive attitude toward its use. Midwifery teaching professionals reported more prior VR experience (56.7%) than medical ones (12.7%). Midwifery students favored early integration, while medical students preferred later, clinically oriented phases. The most frequently prioritized deviations in birth mechanics were occiput posterior position (73.3%), breech presentation (51.4%), and direct occiput position with high station (44.0%), with notable differences between disciplines and educational roles.
conclusionThis study reveals a strong perceived need for a VR application uniting anatomical accuracy with the dynamic processes of childbirth. Birth mechanics deviations were considered particularly suitable for simulation when they represent significant clinical challenges or are rarely demonstrated in current teaching. Tailored, interprofessional VR tools are perceived as potentially valuable for addressing these needs and may enhance obstetric and midwifery education. As part of the V.T.O.B.S. project (Virtual training for obstetric birth simulations), the next step will be the development and evaluation of such an application.
trial registrationThe study protocol was preregistered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00035186 27.09.2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.