ArticleBMC nursing2026
Construction of a preventive nursing protocol for eye complications in critically ill patients undergoing prone position ventilation in China: a Delphi study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a Repeat Suicide Risk Management Protocol for Emergency Department Patients With Suicide Attempts: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo construct a preventive nursing protocol for eye complications in critically ill patients in prone position ventilation (PPV).
backgroundEye complications are common complications of PPV. However, there is a lack of prevention and nursing programs for eye complications associated with PPV in China.
designA Delphi study.
methodsThrough literature review and semi-structured interviews, a preliminary draft of a preventive nursing protocol for eye complications related to PPV was developed. The Delphi method was used to select experts for two rounds of correspondence inquiry. A 5-point Likert scale was used to rate the importance and feasibility of each item. The coefficient of variation (CV), mean score, and level of agreement were calculated to evaluate the consensus among expert opinions.
resultsA total of 19 experts participated in the two rounds of expert consultation. The effective questionnaire response rate was 100% in both rounds, and the expert authority coefficient was 0.91 for each. The Kendall’s harmony coefficients for item importance were 0.09 and 0.27, respectively, and those for item feasibility were 0.11 and 0.21, respectively, with p < 0.05. After two rounds of consultation, all items had a mean score ≥4, and achieved ≥75% agreement, and CV < 0.25. The final protocol consisted of four Level I indicators, 11 Level II indicators, and 33 Level III indicators, encompassing the domains of organizational management, risk assessment, prevention measures, and effect evaluation.
conclusionConsensus was reached on the preventive nursing protocol for eye complications in patients undergoing PPV. The protocol can serve as a valuable reference for clinical practice. Further research is needed to validate its effectiveness and feasibility. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.