Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41519732›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

The trade-off between cost containment and quality enhancement under the DRG payment model.

Zixuan Peng, Xu Chen, Xinyue Lu, Peter C Coyte, Xinping Sha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zixuan PengSchool of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Xu ChenSchool of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xinyue LuDepartment of Data and Information, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Peter C CoyteInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Xinping ShaXiangya Changde Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China. 2532331526@qq.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72504052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe literature has demonstrated that the Diagnostic Related Group (DRG) payment model has been effective in controlling healthcare expenditures. However, there has been a growing concern that an excessive focus on cost reduction could potentially undermine the quality of care provided to patients. This study investigated whether the adoption of the DRG payment model could achieve the dual goal of cost containment and quality enhancement.

methodsThis repeated cross-sectional analysis included 256,438 individuals aged under 18 years with at least one inpatient visit at a Children’s specialized hospital in China from 5 May, 2019 to 31 December, 2022. Individuals with public health insurance coverage form the treatment group, while those without such coverage form the control group. Inpatient expenditures were measured by total inpatient expenditures, inpatient expenditures reimbursed by public health insurance programs, and out-of-pocket inpatient expenditures. Inpatient quality was assessed by readmission rates, length of stay, and recovery rates. The difference-in-difference framework was used to estimate the impacts of adopting the DRG payment model on inpatient expenditures and quality.

resultsBefore the implementation of the DRG payment model, the total inpatient expenditures for the control group and the treatment group averaged at 9,553 CNY (1,311 USD) and 10,685 CNY (1,466 USD), respectively. The implementation of the DRG payment model led to a reduction of -1,351 CNY (185 USD) in total inpatient expenditures. The reduction in total inpatient expenditures was attained through a decrease of -1,787 CNY (245 USD) in inpatient expenditures reimbursed by public health insurance programs but was offset by an increase of 437 CNY (60 USD) in out-of-pocket inpatient expenditures. In terms of quality outcomes, the implementation of the DRG payment model was associated with a 17%, 3% and 25% decrease in readmission rates, length of stay, and recovery rates, respectively.

conclusionsAfter the implementation of the DRG payment model, inpatients incurred significantly lower inpatient expenditures but experienced a decline in their recovery rates. Establishing a monitoring system alongside the implementation of a reward and punishment system is crucial to ensure the quality of care under prospective payment reforms.

Indexed as

Diagnosis-Related GroupsHealth ExpendituresQuality of Health CareReimbursement MechanismsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolChinaCost ControlCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleChinaDiagnostic related groupQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID41519732
PMCPMC12882499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.