ArticleBMC medical education2026
Teaching undergraduates using Tracy Kidder's Rough Sleepers: students' perceptions of homelessness as a public health issue.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHomelessness is a pressing public health issue that is associated with adverse physical and mental health outcomes. Negative perceptions of individuals experiencing homelessness, including stereotyping and stigma, exacerbate health inequalities and impede access to care. Calls to address these issues include the incorporation of culturally competent education for future healthcare providers. This study explored the use of Tracy Kidder's Rough Sleepers as a teaching tool in an undergraduate health sciences course to deepen students' understanding of homelessness as a multifaceted public health issue.
methodsA qualitative, thematic analysis, using a pre- and post-test study design was conducted to assess undergraduate students’ knowledge and perceptions of homelessness, including its relationship to public health. Thirty first-year undergraduate students enrolled in a required health sciences course consented and participated. Participants were asked to complete a baseline questionnaire before being assigned to read Rough Sleepers and engage in weekly discussions with the instructor as part of the six-week course. They completed the same questionnaire post-intervention. Thematic analysis was conducted to assess changes in students' perceptions, understanding, and attitudes toward homelessness, focusing on key domains such as stigma, healthcare access, and systemic factors.
resultsBaseline responses revealed surface-level understandings of homelessness, with students emphasizing basic needs and emotional impacts but demonstrating limited awareness of systemic barriers. Post-intervention, students demonstrated a more nuanced understanding of homelessness as a public health issue, with greater attention to its social and structural determinants, including economic instability, healthcare access, and stigma. Our thematic analysis of the qualitative data collected at baseline and post-intervention yielded three overall themes: 1) Acknowledgement of Homelessness as a Public Health Issue, 2) Awareness of Systemic and Structural Factors, and 3) More Empathy, Less Stigma: A Call for Action.
conclusionThe integration of Rough Sleepers as a teaching tool significantly enhanced students’ understanding of homelessness, fostering empathy, reducing stigma, and promoting awareness of systemic barriers. These findings support the use of popular media in health sciences education to challenge stereotypes and prepare future providers to address public health inequities. Further research is warranted to explore the long-term impacts of such interventions.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.