Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41519708›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2026

Comparison of two sevoflurane formulations in low-flow anesthesia: a retrospective observational study.

Ahmet Rıdvan Doğan, Ali Fuat Erdem, Ayça Taş Tuna

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmet Rıdvan DoğanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Sakarya Training and Research Hospital, Adnan Menderes, Sakarya, 54100, Türkiye. a.ridvandogan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5481-8882
Ali Fuat ErdemDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6994-397X
Ayça Taş TunaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6764-2647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to compare two different sevoflurane formulations (Sevones

methodsThis retrospective observational study was conducted at Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Türkiye. A total of 89 female patients undergoing elective gynecologic surgery under general anesthesia with low-flow sevoflurane (≤ 1 L/min) were included. Patients received either Sevones

resultsTime to reach 1 MAC was similar between Sevones

conclusionsBoth Sevones CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, InhalationMethyl EthersSevofluraneAdultAnesthesia Recovery PeriodFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAnesthetics, InhalationMethyl EthersSevofluraneAnesthetic agentsLow-Flow anesthesiaMinimum alveolar concentrationPharmacodynamicsSevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID41519708
PMCPMC12882400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.