Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41519300›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reports2026

Computational perspectives on tubulin E-hook structure and mechanisms.

Alexander C Bromley, Dana N Reinemann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander C BromleyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677.
Dana N ReinemannDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677. Electronic address: dnreinem@olemiss.edu.

Funding

Biophysical Mechanisms of Force Transmission in Cytoskeletal EnsemblesR35GM147050 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI · PI Dana Nicole Reinemann · 2022 to 2026
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM147050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E-hooks, or the C-terminal tails of tubulin, mediate interactions between microtubules and associated proteins. Despite their functional importance in cellular and physiological processes, their structural variability and mechanistic roles remain poorly understood. E-hooks are thought to be intrinsically disordered to some degree, making crystallographic studies difficult and necessitating the use of computational tools to study their structures and how they change E-hook function. This review synthesizes recent computational efforts to elucidate E-hook structure, dynamics, and functional differentiation across tubulin isotypes. We examine studies probing E-hooks in isolation or with globular cores, which have revealed subunit-specific features influencing microtubule behavior. We also evaluate the role of E-hooks in modulating binding affinity and conformational states of motor proteins and microtubule-associated proteins. Finally, we highlight adjacent technological and methodological advances that have implications for both the interpretation of past findings and the design of future studies, offering new directions for the investigation of E-hook-mediated microtubule regulation.

Indexed as

TubulinAnimalsHumansMicrotubulesModels, MolecularProtein ConformationTubulin

Identifiers

PMID41519300
PMCPMC12933465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.