Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41519188›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2026

RINet: synthetic data training for indirect estimation of clinical reference distributions.

Jack LeBien, Julian Velev, Abiel Roche-Lima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jack LeBienAbartys Health, San Juan, PR 00907-3913, USA. Electronic address: jlebien@abartyshealth.com.
Julian VelevAbartys Health, San Juan, PR 00907-3913, USA; Department of Physics, University of Puerto Rico, PR 00925-2537, USA.
Abiel Roche-LimaCenter for Collaborative Research in Health Disparities, RCMI Program, Medical Science Campus, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR 00936-5067, USA.

Funding

AIM-AHEAD Coordinating Center - All Four CoresOT2OD032581 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI Paul Avillach, Bettina M. Beech · 2021 to 2026
$168.7M
Upstream Regulation and Downstream effectors of c-MYC in Ovarian CancerU54MD007600 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI Emma Fernandez-Repollet · 2017 to 2026
$35.8M
NIH HHS OT2 OD032581NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndirect methods for estimating clinical reference intervals (RIs) use statistical analysis to identify non-pathological sub-distributions within large datasets acquired from routine clinical testing. This approach has the potential to accelerate the estimation of precise RIs, accounting for influential variables such as age, gender, and ethnicity. Most existing methods are based on traditional statistics and hand-crafted algorithms. The investigation of supervised learning, which often outperforms traditional approaches, has been impeded by the limitations of real-world data. However, previous studies have widely used synthetic data for evaluating and benchmarking indirect methods due several advantages over real-world data, including greater control, variability, accessibility, and the availability of exact ground-truth RIs. Synthetic data may also provide a pathway for developing data-driven solutions for indirect RI estimation.

methodsIn this study, we leveraged synthetic data to train two convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to predict the parameters of underlying reference distributions (RDs) in diverse real-world clinical datasets. While one model was trained for standard univariate data, the other was extended to bivariate data, enabling the prediction of covariance between clinical analytes. Trained models were evaluated using both real-world and synthetic test datasets and compared with four alternative algorithms.

resultsModel predictions closely matched directly estimated RIs and RDs in real-world data and known RDs in synthetic data, outperforming four alternative indirect methods: GMM, refineR, reflimR, and RINet

conclusionsSynthetic data training is a viable approach for developing accurate indirect RI estimation models for both univariate and bivariate clinical data. This strategy could help address some limitations of real-world data, direct analyses, and univariate RIs.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerReference ValuesAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleClinical reference rangesDeep learningMedical informaticsMixture distributionsNeural networks

Identifiers

PMID41519188
PMCPMC12923325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.