Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41519158›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Global health2026

Towards a decolonising implementation science: principles from Indigenous leadership.

Christopher G Kemp, Lauren White, Emily E Haroz, Donald Warne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher G KempCenter for Indigenous Health, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: ckemp11@jhu.edu.
Lauren WhiteIndigenous Wellness Research Institute, School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Emily E HarozCenter for Indigenous Health, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Donald WarneCenter for Indigenous Health, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Anna Palmer Durbin · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
Research Project 3P50DA058619 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Melissa L. Walls · 2023 to 2026
$12.9M
The ITZA Program: Indigenous HIV/AIDS Research Training 3 (IHART3) ProgramR25MH084565 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Teresa A Evans-Campbell, Michelle D Johnson-Jennings · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
NATIVE RISE-Risk Identification for Suicide and Enhanced care for Native AmericansR01MH128518 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Emily Haroz · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
Family Spirit Strengths: A home visiting strategy to support parents and caregivers with mental distress and substance misuseR01DA057913 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Emily Haroz, Lisa Danielle Martin · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
Intervention Research to Improve Native American HealthR01MH136768 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lisa M. Wexler · 2024 to 2026
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA058619NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA057913NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128518NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH136768NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH084565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation science is a diverse and evolving field that draws on multiple epistemologies and methods. However, the dominant foundations of implementation science remain settler colonial, biomedical, and positivist. In Indigenous and other marginalised settings, these foundations can result in poor epistemological, ethical, and practical fit. We argue that a paradigm shift that is grounded in Indigenous values, sovereignty, relationality, and epistemologies is needed. We propose seven guiding principles for a decolonising implementation science. Drawing from emerging scholarship and innovative Indigenous-led frameworks from the USA, Aotearoa New Zealand, and Australia, these principles centre sovereignty, strengths-based approaches, and relational accountability. These principles also offer a roadmap to redefine rigour, expand what counts as evidence, and ensure genuine community control over the research process. Although born from Indigenous experience, these principles provide a framework for transforming implementation science to be more just, equitable, and effective for marginalised communities globally.

Indexed as

Health Services, IndigenousImplementation ScienceLeadershipAustraliaHumansNew ZealandUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41519158
PMCPMC12916028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.