Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41519152›Full record

Observational studyThe Lancet. Global health2026

Medical oxygen and respiratory support requirements for patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in 23 low-income and middle-income countries: a prospective, observational cohort study.

Pryanka Relan, Jamie Rylance, Yaseen M Arabi, Pauline Convocar, Matthieu Rolland, Janet V Diaz, O2CoV2 investigators

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Lancet. Global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04918875 (Oxygen Requirements and Approaches to Respiratory Support in Patients With COVID-19 in LMICs), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04918875 unknown statusnot on this map

Oxygen Requirements and Approaches to Respiratory Support in Patients With COVID-19 in LMICs: A WHO Study

TypeobservationalSponsorPryanka RelanRan2022 to 2023Enrolled2,400ConditionsCovid19, COVID-19 Pneumonia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pryanka RelanWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jamie RylanceWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: rylancej@who.int.
Yaseen M ArabiKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Pauline ConvocarSouthern Philippines Medical Center, Davao City, Philippines.
Matthieu RollandWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Janet V DiazWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
O2CoV2 investigators

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic highlighted a global shortage of, and inequity of access to, medical oxygen. Understanding patient outcomes and the capacities of health facilities to provide respiratory support including oxygen is key to matching need and demand. We report results from a global study including 23 low-income and middle-income countries.

methodsFor this prospective, observational cohort study, consecutive patients aged 12 years or older with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 and evidence of respiratory distress were prospectively recruited within 24 h of hospital admission. Hospitals from 23 low-income and middle-income countries were included, representing all WHO regions. Baseline demographic and clinical data were collected, and daily follow-ups were recorded for in-hospital outcomes and respiratory support types. At the facility level, we assessed sources of oxygen and electricity, infrastructural and staffing capacity for critical care provision, and the capabilities of the facility for advanced respiratory support. The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04918875).

findingsBetween Jan 24 and Nov 22, 2022, 56 sites took part. Of 53 726 patients screened, 3070 were enrolled. 1814 (61·6%) of 2947 patients had two or more underlying medical conditions and initially received oxygen through nasal cannula or non-rebreather face masks with reservoir. Invasive mechanical ventilation was most frequently used in patients recruited in the Americas (75 [26·4%] of 284 patients) and in the Eastern Mediterranean (90 [18·0%] of 499 patients). The overall mortality was 649 (23·4%) of 2779 patients, varying by region from 53 (10·5%) of 506 patients in South-East Asia to 286 (37·6%) of 760 patients in Africa. Mortality was associated with the maximum level of respiratory support received: from 17 (8·6%) of 198 patients who received no oxygen, 99 (38·4%) of 258 patients for non-rebreather reservoir bags, and 205 (62·9%) of 326 for invasive ventilation.

interpretationThe availability and use of oxygen support options in low-income and middle-income countries are highly variable but appear significantly less in the African region. Mortality might be associated with a lack of access to oxygen, which varied across WHO regions but was highest in Africa. Despite many lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, inequity in access to medical oxygen remains a challenge that WHO and partners must address in the post-pandemic era to avoid preventable deaths.

fundingUNITAID.

Indexed as

COVID-19Developing CountriesOxygen Inhalation TherapyRespiration, ArtificialAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41519152
PMCPMC12795722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.