ArticleTranslational stroke research2026
Internal Capsule Involvement Explains the Prognostic Impact of ASPECTS after Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large-Core Infarction.
Article in Translational stroke research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognostic implications of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) subscores in patients with large-core ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) remain uncertain. We hypothesized that specific ASPECTS regions substantially influence functional outcomes after EVT and therefore sought to identify which individual subscores are associated with outcome and whether any of them account for the association between total ASPECTS and functional outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed patients with large-core ischemic stroke (ASPECTS ≤ 5) who underwent EVT. Multivariate logistic regression identified factors associated with functional outcomes, and mediation analysis assessed whether specific ASPECTS subscores explains the effect of total ASPECTS on outcomes. Among 295 patients (median ASPECTS 4), 49.2% had a median mRS score of 3 at 3 months. Internal capsule (IC) involvement was the only subscore significantly associated with worse outcomes, including ordinal mRS shift (Odds ratio 2.03 [ 95% confidence interval 1.19‒3.46], P = 0.009), mRS ≥ 4 (3.01 [1.45‒6.24], P = 0.003), and mRS ≥ 3 (2.24 [1.03‒4.87], P = 0.042). Mediation analysis showed that IC involvement explained 50.6% of the total ASPECTS effect on outcomes. Patients with IC lesions showing reversal on follow-up imaging had a significantly lower risk of poor outcomes (0.28 [0.09-0.80], P = 0.018). IC involvement independently predicts poor outcomes after EVT for large-core stroke and substantially explains the effect of total ASPECTS on prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41518586What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.