Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41518576›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026

Prodrug-ML: prodrug-likeness prediction via machine learning on sampled negative decoys.

Sadettin Y Ugurlu, Shan He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sadettin Y UgurluNovexus Ltd, 07058, Antalya, Turkey.
Shan HeSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. s.he.1@bham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prodrug is a pharmacologically inactive (or attenuated) derivative that undergoes bioreversible transformation in vivo to release an active parent drug, enabling temporary optimization of properties such as solubility, permeability, and targeting. Despite expanding catalogs of known prodrugs, in silico screening remains limited by the absence of reliable negative examples: training/evaluation sets often contain only positives or ad-hoc decoys, leading to class imbalance, property-mismatch shortcuts, and irreproducible benchmarks. Unfortunately, the limitation of reliable negatives has resulted in there being no efficient machine learning-based prodrug screening approach. Therefore, we introduce Prodrug-ML, an efficient machine learning-based screen for prodrug-likeness that prioritizes candidates rather than asserting mechanistic truth. Prodrug-ML helps medicinal chemists triage prodrugging ideas during hit-to-lead and lead optimization, filter enumerated libraries of promoiety-attachment variants before ADMET assays, and retrospectively mine internal/ChEMBL-like collections to surface likely prodrug chemotypes. In practice, users (i) generate or collect candidate structures (e.g., parent drug ± pro-moieties), (ii) score them with Prodrug-ML, and (iii) advance only high-scoring candidates to synthesis/assay, thereby reducing wet-lab load while maintaining chemical diversity. In order to achieve such practical usage, the Prodrug-ML framework, containing the default classifier, LightGBM, addresses these issues by (i) constructing three complementary, property-controlled negative cohorts (DUD-E-style near-misses, random ChEMBL, and strictly filtered ChEMBL), (ii) hardness control and label-noise guardrails on decoys, (iii) domain-bias control, and (iv) cross-decoy validation with multimodel feature selection. Produg-ML has been evaluated five times on hold-out data and an unseen test benchmark, after 80% of training data. In the benchmarks, the multimodel ensemble consistently improves early retrieval and overall discrimination, attaining [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text], alongside ROC AUC [Formula: see text], average precision [Formula: see text], and F1 [Formula: see text]. As a result, these results, especially high BEDROC scores, are consistent with concentrating at least a prodrug within the top [Formula: see text] of ranked candidates, implying [Formula: see text] reductions in experimental time and cost when using standard wet-lab workflows that assay only the early tranche.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProdrugsHumansSolubilityProdrugsgenerating negative decoysmultimodel feature selectionProdrugssampling negative decoys

Identifiers

PMID41518576
PMCPMC12790554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.