Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Daycare-simulated interrupted phototherapy for neonatal jaundice: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Therapeutic equivalence of intermittent and continuous phototherapy for neonatal jaundice: a systematic review & meta-analysis with regression and trial sequential analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of daycare-simulated interrupted phototherapy versus continuous phototherapy for treating neonatal jaundice. A parallel randomized controlled trial with one-to-one allocation was conducted involving low-risk jaundiced neonates. The neonates in the intervention group received 10 h of phototherapy, while the control group received continuous phototherapy for 24 h. Total serum bilirubin (TSB) was measured before the start of phototherapy and at 24 h of treatment. Seventy-four neonates were recruited, and 37 neonates were randomly allocated to each group. The mean rate of fall of TSB per hour was not statistically significantly different between the intervention and control groups (1.71 versus 1.9 µmol/L/h; p = 0.529). The mean of TSB post-treatment in the intervention group was higher than in the control group and statistically significant (182 versus 158 µmol/L; p = 0.045) but not clinically significant, as none of the neonates required reinstitution or continuation of phototherapy.
conclusionTen hours of phototherapy which could be given in daycare may be effective and safe.
trial registrationThis trial wasregistered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials (trial ID: ANZCTR 12624000860561) prospectively on 12 July 2024. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Intermittent phototherapy is known to be as effective as continuous phototherapy. WHAT IS NEW: • We designed a study in which phototherapy was interrupted after 10 h, simulating daycare phototherapy. • Daycare phototherapy for 10 h may be feasible in treating neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in low-risk neonates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.