Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41518523›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026

Bayesian neural networks for genomic prediction: uncertainty quantification and SNP interpretation with SHAP and GWAS.

Jin Sun, Xiaoran Zhang, Xiaowei You, Osval A Montesinos-López, Abelardo Montesinos-López, José Crossa, Mark E Sorrells

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jin SunDepartment of Statistics, School of Science, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, 066004, China. sunjinwork@ysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1331-5250
Xiaoran ZhangDepartment of Statistics, School of Science, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, 066004, China.
Xiaowei YouDepartment of Statistics, School of Science, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, 066004, China.
Osval A Montesinos-LópezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, 28040, Colima, México.
Abelardo Montesinos-LópezCentro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, 44430, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México-Veracruz, Km. 45El Batán, 56237, Texcoco, CP, México.
Mark E SorrellsPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Funding

Hebei Natural Science Foundation C2022203005National Natural Science Foundation of China 32401921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageThis study presents a Bayesian neural networks framework with LASSO regularization and the GSMeSP interpretability tool, enabling accurate, uncertainty-aware, and biologically interpretable genomic prediction. Deep learning offers significant potential for genomic prediction by modeling complex, nonlinear genotype-phenotype relationships. However, its application in plant breeding has been constrained by limited model interpretability and a lack of uncertainty quantification. To address these challenges, we developed a Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) framework incorporating least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regularization for multi-trait genomic prediction with credible uncertainty estimation. In parallel, we introduce GSMeSP, a novel interpretability framework that integrates SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) with genome-wide association study (GWAS) signals to prioritize trait-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from both statistical and biological perspectives. We applied this framework to a diverse panel of 1385 upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) accessions genotyped with over 12,000 SNPs, evaluating performance across multiple fiber-related traits. The BNNs model consistently outperformed conventional and deep learning benchmarks, achieving 0.46-47.85% improvements in predictive accuracy. Moreover, it generated trait- and sample-specific 95% credible intervals, enabling robust uncertainty quantification and more informed selection decisions. Using GSMeSP, we identified biologically meaningful loci, with a substantial proportion of top-ranked SNPs located in the D-subgenome. Notably, chromosome D05 emerged as a genomic hotspot enriched for SNPs associated with fiber length, lint percentage, and uniformity. By integrating high predictive performance, credible uncertainty estimation, and biologically grounded interpretability, our framework provides a transparent and robust deep learning approach to accelerate genomic selection in crop breeding programs.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsGossypiumNeural Networks, ComputerPolymorphism, Single NucleotideBayes TheoremGenotypeModels, GeneticPhenotypePlant BreedingUncertaintyBayesian neural networksGenome-wide association studyGenomic selectionGSMeSPLeast absolute shrinkage and selection operatorSHapley Additive exPlanations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.