Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41518480›Full record

Observational studyEpilepsia2026

Sex-specific elevated incidence of glaucoma associated with topiramate versus valproate or lamotrigine in epilepsy, not migraine: A population-based cohort study.

Cuiling Wei, Rachel Yui Ki Chu, Rachel Lancey Lai, Florinda Hui-Ning Chu, Ian Yu Hin Leung, William Chun Yin Leung, Franco Wing Tak Cheng, Thomas Chi Ho Lam, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Esther Wai Yin Chan and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cuiling WeiCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2018-6072
Rachel Yui Ki ChuCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5443-8153
Rachel Lancey LaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong & Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Florinda Hui-Ning ChuDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ian Yu Hin LeungDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
William Chun Yin LeungDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7363-0239
Franco Wing Tak ChengCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7818-1575
Thomas Chi Ho LamHong Kong Eye Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4256-9400
Ian Chi Kei WongCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8242-0014
Esther Wai Yin ChanCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7602-9470
Francisco Tsz Tsun LaiCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9121-1959

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTopiramate has been linked to increased glaucoma risk, potentially through mechanisms involving ocular fluid shifts. However, comparative risks vs other antiseizure medications (ASMs) and variation by sex or indication remain uncertain. This study evaluates glaucoma incidence in topiramate initiators compared to valproate or lamotrigine users among patients with epilepsy or migraine.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective active-comparator, new-user cohort study using electronic health records from the IQVIA Medical Research Data among patients with epilepsy or migraine initiating topiramate, valproate, or lamotrigine. Patients with prior ASM use, limited washout period and follow-up, or pre-existing glaucoma were excluded. The outcome was incident glaucoma within 1 year, censored at glaucoma occurrence, death, discontinuation, switch, or September 30, 2023. Covariates included age, sex, race, lifestyle factors, comorbidities, and medication history. Propensity score-based inverse probability weighting balanced characteristics, and crude and weighted Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were conducted by sex, age, and indication.

resultsThe cohort included 688 topiramate, 4490 valproate, and 4179 lamotrigine initiators. After weighting, the 1-year absolute risk increase was approximately 2.4% when comparing topiramate to valproate, and about 2.0% compared to lamotrigine. Topiramate was associated with higher glaucoma risk vs valproate (adjusted HR 2.66, 95% CI 1.12-6.32) and lamotrigine (adjusted HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.76-7.26). Risks were elevated in female (vs valproate: HR 5.31, 95% CI 1.48-19.08; vs lamotrigine: HR 5.73, 95% CI 2.38-13.79) or epilepsy patients (vs valproate: HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.04-4.76; vs lamotrigine: HR 5.08, 95% CI 2.32-11.14), but not in male or migraine patients. SIGNIFICANCE: Topiramate use substantially increases glaucoma risk compared with valproate and lamotrigine, particularly among female or epilepsy patients. No significant association in male or migraine patients was observed. These findings may inform targeted ophthalmologic monitoring in high-risk groups and use of alternative ASMs.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsEpilepsyGlaucomaMigraine DisordersSex FactorsAdultFemaleHumansIncidenceLamotrigineMaleRetrospective StudiesTopiramateValproic AcidAnticonvulsantsLamotrigineTopiramateValproic Acidglaucomalamotriginetopiramatevalproate

Identifiers

PMID41518480
PMCPMC13075613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.