ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026
Resolution of Null and Overt Pronouns in Catalan: An Eye Tracking Study.
Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates subject pronoun resolution in Catalan, a null-subject language, by examining linguistic and cognitive factors. We focus on gender, pronoun type (null and overt), and syntactic function (subject and object), as well as the order of mention (first and second) of antecedents. Using eye-tracking in the Visual World Paradigm (VWP), we analyze the interplay between these factors in both canonical (SVO) and non-canonical (OVS) sentence structures. Experiments 1, 2 and 3 (Study 1) explore how gender cues and pronoun type influence pronominal resolution in SVO sentences. Our findings reveal that gender facilitates early resolution but primarily affects first-mentioned antecedents. Null pronouns exhibit a strong preference for subject antecedents. However, overt pronouns, contrary to offline studies, show no strong preference for object antecedents and instead tend to favor first-mentioned subjects in ambiguous contexts. In unambiguous gender-marked cases, overt pronouns heavily rely on gender cues for reference resolution, but in ambiguous contexts, they display delayed resolution patterns. These results suggest that overt and null pronouns do not exhibit the expected division of labor proposed by the Position of Antecedent Hypothesis (PAH). Instead, null pronouns robustly refer to subject antecedents, while overt pronouns show more variability. Experiments 4 and 5 (Study 2) extend this investigation to OVS sentences, revealing that linear order exerts a stronger influence on pronoun resolution than grammatical subjecthood. Specifically, first-mentioned antecedents, rather than syntactic subjects, guide resolution in OVS structures, particularly for overt pronouns. This challenges previous findings that overt pronouns prefer object antecedents and highlights positional prominence as a crucial factor in pronoun resolution in Catalan. Overall, our results contribute to a broader understanding of pronoun processing across null-subject languages and underscore the importance of positional prominence in pronominal interpretation and suggest that, in non-canonical structures, order-of-mention can override subjecthood in guiding resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.