ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Evaluation of video background and stimulus transparency in a visual ERP-based BCI under RSVP.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) is a promising paradigm for visual brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) based on event-related potentials (ERPs) for patients with limited muscle and eye movement. This study explores the impact of video background and stimulus transparency on BCI control, factors that have not been previously examined together under RSVP. Two experimental sessions were conducted with 12 participants each. Four BCI conditions were tested: opaque pictograms, and white background (A255W); opaque pictograms, and video background (A255V); intermediate transparent pictograms, and video background (A085); and highly transparent pictograms, and video background (A028V). The results indicated that the video background had a negative impact on BCI performance. In addition, the intermediate transparent pictograms (A085V) proved to be balanced, as it did not show significant performance differences compared to opaque pictograms (A255V) but was rated significantly better by users on subjective measures related to attending to the video background. Therefore, in applications where users must shift attention between BCI control and their surroundings, balancing stimulus transparency is a suitable option for enhancing system usability. These findings are particularly relevant for designing asynchronous ERP-BCIs using RSVP for patients with impaired oculomotor control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.