ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
A novel classification of periodontal phenotype integrating hard and soft tissue parameters using data-driven clustering.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanobiology and Molecular Regulation of Periodontal Tissue Remodeling During Orthodontic Tooth Movement: From Periodontal Phenotype to Precision Orthodontics-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo combine quantitative measures of gingival thickness (GT), keratinized tissue width (KTW), and alveolar buccal bone thickness (ABT) for developing a novel classification of periodontal phenotype through a clustering analysis, using two digital images. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study comprised 180 subjects with a total of 1080 maxillary anterior teeth. GT and ABT were assessed utilizing superimposed Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scan data, while KTW was obtained from intraoral images employing a correction factor. Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was conducted to discern phenotypic categories. Cutoff values for GT, KTW, and ABT were derived from cluster boundaries to provide a clinically applicable scoring system.
resultsCluster analysis identified four statistically significant phenotypic groupings (p < 0.001). Only 48.9% of instances accounted for conventional "thin" or "thick" phenotypes, while 51.1% exhibited mixed characteristics. Cutoff values were established as GT = 0.85 mm, KTW = 3.0 mm, and ABT = 1.0 mm. Based on these cutoffs, a scoring system (0-3) was developed to classify individuals as fully thin, majority-thin (gingival thin/ bone thick)" and "majority-thick (gingival thick/ bone thin), or fully thick. This system demonstrated good internal consistency, with moderate to high coefficients of determination (R²) across parameters.
conclusionThis study presents a comprehensive, data-driven classification of periodontal phenotype using quantitative evaluations of GT, KTW, and ABT, providing an innovative viewpoint on phenotype-based diagnostics. The proposed system offers a clinically relevant framework for phenotype-based diagnostics, risk evaluation, and individualized treatment planning. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: By combining soft (GT, KTW) and hard (ABT) tissue parameters with 3D imaging and clustering analysis, this classification provides clinicians with a practical and quantitative tool for assessing periodontal phenotype, thereby supporting accurate diagnosis and evidence-based decision-making across multiple dental disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41518398What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.