ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026
Utilizing artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of ocular surface squamous neoplasia with ultrasound biomicroscopy images.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology Imaging: Approximation to Ocular Histopathology.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to assist ophthalmologists in distinguishing ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) from benign ocular surface lesions using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) images.
methodsData were retrospectively collected from 139 patients with biopsy-proven conjunctival lesions, including 201 UBM images of benign lesions (e.g.,pterygium, squamous papilloma) and 381 images of OSSN (e.g.,squamous cell carcinoma, conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia). Patients with conjunctival pigmented lesions, melanoma, lymphoma, or those without a pathological diagnosis were excluded. UBM images were cropped to the anterior segment region and rescaled to a standard size of 300 × 200 pixels. Data augmentation techniques were applied to enhance the diversity of training images. A convolutional neural network was trained and tested using five-fold cross-validation. A heatmap was generated to illustrate the model's decision-making process. The AI model's performance was compared to that of three human experts with varying levels of experience. Additionally, univariate regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of patient-related factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity, lesion location, and side) on model performance.
resultsOur AI model achieved an accuracy of 74.3 ± 3.9%, sensitivity of 75.0 ± 8.6%, specificity 73.0 ± 11.5%, precision of 83.3 ± 4.8%, F1 score (i.e., the harmonic mean of precision and recall) of 0.79 ± 0.06,and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.83 ± 0.03 in detection of OSSN. It significantly outperformed two ocular oncology fellows (p = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively) and demonstrated borderline significance compared to a senior ophthalmologist (p = 0.05). The heatmaps effectively highlighted the lesions, suggesting that echogenicity played a crucial role in the model's predictions. None of the patient-related factors significantly affected model performance (all p > 0.1), supporting its equitable diagnostic capability across diverse patient groups.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of using AI to differentiate OSSN from benign conjunctival lesions based on UBM images. The heatmap enhances model transparency, and the consistent performance across patient subgroups highlights its potential as a fair and valuable tool for clinical decision-making in ocular surface tumor evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.