ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
Sex Classification Based on the Functional Connectivity Patterns of the Language Network: A Resting State fMRI Study.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sex Classification Based on the Functional Connectivity Patterns of the Language Network: A Resting State fMRI Study.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research on sex differences in the brain is essential for a better understanding of how the brain develops and ages, and how neurological and psychiatric conditions can impact men and women differently. While numerous studies have focused on sex differences in brain structures, few have examined the characteristics of functional networks, particularly the language network. Although previous research suggests similar overall language performance across sexes, differences may still exist in the brain networks that underlie language processing. In addition, prior studies on sex differences in language have predominantly relied on task-based fMRI, which may fail to capture subtle differences in underlying functional activity. In this study, we applied a machine learning approach to classify participants' sex based on resting-state functional connectivity patterns of the language network in healthy young adults (270 men and 288 women; age: 22-36 years), and to identify the most predictive functional connectivity features. The classifier achieved 91.3% accuracy, with key discriminant features anchored to the left opercular part of the inferior frontal gyrus, the left planum temporale, and the left anterior middle temporal gyrus. These regions show distinctive connectivity patterns with heteromodal association cortices, including the occipital poles, angular gyrus, posterior cingulate gyrus, and intraparietal sulcus. Although there was an overlap between men and women, men displayed stronger functional connectivity values in these regions. These findings highlight sex-related differences in functional connectivity patterns of the language network at rest, underscoring the importance of considering sex as a variable in future research on language and brain function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.